Always try to use new farming tricks.

Today’s ag economy makes knowledge and information key factors in making crop input decisions.  Farmers can’t just try something because it may work or because it sounds good. Whatever inputs you are using, it is critical to not only make sure that it works but that it works the best that it can. Take planter fertilizers and “starters”. The theory in using starter fertilizer is that it gets the plant growing faster after emergence and that rapid establishment will enable better yield. However, some experts believe a faster start doesn’t necessarily mean a higher yield. So, who do you believe? Again, some education will help you make informed decisions.




As a fertilizer researcher for over 25 years, I believe education can lead to better decisions….but you don’t have to be an expert to evaluate the risks and benefits of starter fertilizer. AgroLiquid is fortunate to have a 1000-acre research farm, the North Central Research Station (NCRS), where replicated test plot experiments can be established in order to investigate fertility issues under a variety of conditions. Planter fertilizer opportunities have been investigated routinely at the NCRS since 1994. Based on that research, we have identified the following considerations when deciding on whether starter fertilizers are the right choice for your farm:


Choose your weapon

Just like everything in agriculture, there is not a “one size fits all” approach to starters. Some fertilizers are “commodity” types that are commonly available, like 10-34-0, but can vary in price and quality (some good, some not-so-good). Others are private labels, made by a company that promotes high quality along with other unique characteristics. These are often higher in price per gallon, but that can be offset by lower use rateshigher yield, and other characteristics such as cleanliness and ease of handling. An experiment at the North Central Research Station compared 3 gallon-per-acre rates of several in-furrow fertilizers and found the following yields.


Know your target

You don’t use just any herbicide on all of your fields and hope it takes care of the weeds you have. You select what fits your needs. The same should apply to starter fertilizers. I used to think that you just apply an in-furrow application of a fertilizer with a little N for an early push and some P for roots and you are good to go. But, research at the NCRS shows that you can improve results if your starter reflects what the whole plant nutrient needs are based on the soil test. Fields in this area are low in potassium (K), and the addition of some K fertilizer to the nitrogen and phosphorus starter saw an increased yield over that with phosphorus fertilizer alone.

At the NCRS, we have shown a starter fertilizer shouldn’t be expected to work without needed micronutrients. In this picture of soybeans (below), we are looking at the outside rows of two plots.  Both plots received a planter application of 5 gallons per acre of a 3-8-13 liquid fertilizer. The plot row on the right is showing severe manganese (Mn) deficiency but the plot on the left received a foliar application of a 4% manganese fertilizer along with an application of Roundup®. Even with the applied fertilizer, it’s critical to not overlook the micronutrients. In the end, the plots that received the foliar application had double the yield of the plots with Mn deficiency (35 bu/A vs 17 bu/A).


Courtesy by:

Best fertilizer in the United States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Use organic fertilizer to grow your farmland

Love the nature to grow your healthy farm.

Garden Fertilizers vs. Soil Amendments – What’s the Difference?